October 23, 2020
Tech Can't Change Personal Advisers

Tech Can’t Change Personal Advisers

Investment banks have essentially evolved into technology engines, making trading decisions and routing orders in milliseconds. However, one old-school and people-dependent specialty within investment banking remains robust, highly profitable and resistant to market swings – M&A advisory.

Pressured by rising compliance and technology costs and falling margins across many business lines, investment banks are acquiring M&A advisory businesses to achieve more resilient revenue streams, industry executives tell Mergermarket.

Piper Jaffray’s $485 million acquisition of Sandler O’Neill, announced in July, was the second largest investment banking deal since 2016, following Permira Advisers’ $1.75 billion acquisition of Duff & Phelps in 2017.

Overall, deal flow is climbing in the sector. Year-to-date there have been 20 acquisitions of M&A advisory firms, compared to a total of 17 in all of 2018, 16 in 2017 and 14 in 2016, Mergermarket data show.

Investment banking is still a very fragmented industry, says Scott Adelson, Co-President of Houlihan Lokey. The cost of regulatory compliance is expected to continue climbing, and investing in technology is necessary for banks to remain “best-in class.” But doing so is difficult when a firm does not have scale, Adelson says.

Unlike sales, trading and research, M&A advisory is one of the few remaining profitable business lines for investment banks, says Emmett Daly, principal of investment banking at Sandler O’Neill.

“Personal relationships and sound advice have not been commoditized by technology. Clients will always pay for judgement and trust,” Daly says.

Firms, especially those with trading businesses, are facing structural changes that are narrowing margins and making some business lines uneconomical, Daly notes. These challenges are prompting them to join forces with peers.

Equities businesses have been under pressure for the past decade, with many institutional investors moving from active to passive portfolio management. Revenue from underwriting equities is also subject to greater swings, while M&A advisory work has higher margins and has consistently generated fees over a long period of time, says Jim Bunn, president of global equities and investment banking at Raymond James.

Stricter capital markets rules, such as MiFID II, are another pressure point for investment banks, Bunn adds. The European legislative framework, most recently updated in January 2018, requires fund managers to unbundle their budgets for research and trading services, which previously tended to be provided by the same broker-dealer. This move has resulted in fund managers shifting the business to multiple broker-dealers.
Source@ https://www.macouncil.org/blog/2019/09/21/tech-cant-replace-personal-advisors

Saurabh

Saurabh is an SEO Analyst professional, working on a large marketing and sales platform that helps firms attract visitors and close customers. Proficient in monitoring and evaluating search results and search performance across the major search channels. With his strong analytical skills. Saurabh covers healthcare, technological, chemical, lifestyle and trendy news from all over the world.

View all posts by Saurabh →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *